(no subject)
May. 30th, 2005 05:55 pmMy boss just sent me this article. It won't be news, or applicable, to most of you, but I'm finding it interesting.
One of the biggest problems with categorizing things in advance is that it forces the categorizers to take on two jobs that have historically been quite hard: mind reading, and fortune telling.
Also, there's a shout-out to LiveJournal, which is always good.
One of the biggest problems with categorizing things in advance is that it forces the categorizers to take on two jobs that have historically been quite hard: mind reading, and fortune telling.
Also, there's a shout-out to LiveJournal, which is always good.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-30 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 02:14 am (UTC)LJ needs to have a way of letting users create interest groups, much as Clay describes the use of tags later in his article.
I've been wanting to write a program to do that for some time now, but I have so many projects I don't know if I ever will.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 05:51 am (UTC)The idea would be to have a fluid set of categories and a fuzzy set of which interests were generally believed to fall into which categories.
I worked out the details with
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 04:05 pm (UTC)