Date: 2006-03-03 07:03 pm (UTC)
Well, the concern usually comes when provincial governments say vague things about "allowing more private care" without specifying what they mean. The big issue with the Supreme Court decision was that it opened the door for people to buy supplementary (private) coverage if they weren't getting timely care, which in theory could lead to two-tier health care (good speedy care for the rich, slow crappy care for the poor, doctors and other providers sucked out of the public system because they can make more in the private system), which violates the universality principle of the Canada Health Act. And probably the accessibility one too, actually.

But no, there's certainly no move (well, except on the lunatic fringe) to privatize the whole industry.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

electricland: (Default)
electricland

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 06:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios