(no subject)
May. 4th, 2005 10:26 amWatched House last night. Finally gave in and shouted "YOU ARE ALL TERRIBLE DOCTORS!" at the screen in Harry Potteresque fashion. And yet it compels me. Odd and maddening.
Can anybody satisfy my idle curiosity and fill me in on what's been going on the last few weeks? I was watching This Is Wonderland.
Can anybody satisfy my idle curiosity and fill me in on what's been going on the last few weeks? I was watching This Is Wonderland.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 03:40 pm (UTC)I so need to see Peter's Friends, but I can't seem to find a video store w/ a copy!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 03:45 pm (UTC)The main reason I watch the show is so I can watch the Prince Regent yell at people. Hugh Laurie is great. (I still haven't seen his Bertie Wooster!)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 04:02 pm (UTC)I find House frustrating for many reasons, but yeah, the problem-solving is no longer compelling because they are ALWAYS right. Eventually. And the disease is always bizarre and tricksy and they're always horrible to the patient and, and, and... I thought Vogler was onto something. Why the hell is the hospital spending so much for so damn little? I'd fire their asses.
Actually I think Cuddy may be my favourite character.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 04:17 pm (UTC)Although the oncologist guy -- I've been in friendships like that. People who are so amazingly smart and entertaining to be around that you find yourself absorbing a monstrous quantity of bullshit for the sake of the friendship. (And now he's sleeping in Cook County Jail.) It really isn't fun to watch from close range while somebody fucks their life up. For all of House's abrasiveness, though, there's not enough of an edge to his anger. It's too clearly a defensive mechanism, and they won't put that much meanness in the main character of a network show. (House needs a little more Swearengen in him.)
What is still compelling about the show, though, is that its offered, by TV standards certainly, a smart take on complicated issues of disability and addiction. I thought the way abortion was handled in last night's episode was pretty decent, too. I don't watch that much TV, but as far as I know it's still rare to see any direct take on the subject on TV drama.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 04:39 pm (UTC)I have a whole rant on the topic that I will spare you most of. For now.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 04:44 pm (UTC)I love Hugh Laurie and his crotchey-ness, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 04:52 pm (UTC)House is so contemptuous of ALL the patients. That Sherlock-Holmes-of-medicine thing bugs me too, because you can't always tell what's wrong with a patient just by looking at them, no matter how brilliant you are.
Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:00 pm (UTC)You're right that House abortion handled the abortion coldly last night, but I kind of appreciated the way House (the show) handled it, in that (a) they took on the subject at all, which, as I said, seems pretty rare, and (b) that they made the subject kind of incidental. They felt like they could mention the subject of abortion without having it be the entire focus of the episode. That seems kind of a bold choice.
(Also -- while House did mention to the girl that a felony had been committed, I immediately had the three-year rule pop into my head (not statutory rape if the couple are within three years of each other). Ten years since I lived in Jersey, and a lot longer since I was a teenager there, but I still remember the age of consent laws.)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:05 pm (UTC)My crackpot theory about the show is as follows: None of it is real, and it is all taking place in the demented megalomaniac brain of a comatose and/or lunatic House. Sometimes this comforts me.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:08 pm (UTC)ok, your idea of why a television show is worth watching clearly diverges from mine. But this is not really a surprise to either of us, methinks.
Also, my job? sucks.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 06:44 pm (UTC)I think maybe the series finale of Seventh Heaven will reveal that the entire show has been a fantasy spun by the dad in the instants before he dies in a fiery car wreck.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 06:47 pm (UTC)I've liked House's irreligiosity, too. Of course, this is probably just supposed to be another example of his atrocious behavior.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:06 pm (UTC)Last nights ep showed layers that weren't there at the beginning of the season, when the problem solving aspect was foregrounded. Now the problem solving is much more contextualized, it is part of the nuance of the characters. The show has, in my opinion, moved from simply being a device driven, formulaic show -- sick person, really wonky symptoms, oops darn, first diagnosis wrong, person even MORE sick, damn shit what can it be -- EUREKA -- to something where the formula becomes a way to explore the nuances of the lead anti-heroic character. Perfect? no. And ya, there are certainly things the show does for dramatic effect, that wouldn't work in real medicine or in a real hospital.
But it is covering interesting character developments -- though I think maybe you need to see all the eps (I've seen most of them) to truly see that, because the changes and the hints are ever so subtle.
But back to the issue of "reality" and the fact that they are "bad doctors" etc. I tend to think about medical and lawyer shows a lot like I think of sci-fi/fantasy type shows. John Crichton, in the real world, as we understand it today - at least IMHO, could never have gone through a wormhole and gotten stuck in another universe. But that gimmick, that device, spawned a WHOLE LOT of interesting story telling, as I understand it. Similarly, IRL, Buffy Summers would be far more likely to be written off as the insane girl (a la that ep in season 7) than she would be deemed a hero. And yet playing her as the hero allowed many issues about growing up and womanhood and life to be explored. So, ya, ok, House and his team? probably wouldn't survive in today's medical system. But their gruff bedside manner and questionable ethics reveal a LOT about the foibles of human beings and the struggles that surround illness and healing. And their ability to sort through complicated medical problems is a bit heroic, if not terribly realistic (ie: this team would lose more patients than it saves IRL). Kind of like The West Wing - realistic politics? prolly not. But cool to watch, anyway.
also, my job? is a pain in the ass because NO one communicates, they just make demands and then bitch and complain when they get told THEIR priorities are not the ones I have been given. Horizontal hierarchy my ass.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:17 pm (UTC)in his own inimitable way he DID encourage her to talk to her parents about it
sorry, not good enough for me! This only works if all patients speak and understand House-code.
their gruff bedside manner and questionable ethics reveal a LOT about the foibles of human beings and the struggles that surround illness and healing
I tried to make that fly for me for a while, a couple of months ago. Again, I can't agree. I think the show takes too narrow a view of what it means to be a healer to be able to reveal those struggles in any meaningful way.
Still, you could be right about the character developments. I have watched most of the eps, I think (well over half, anyway). It could be that I don't like any of them enough to care about how subtly (or, in Chase's case, somewhat psychotically) their characters are changing. But I keep watching, so clearly I'm getting something out of it, even if I'm not quite sure what it is yet!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:26 pm (UTC)ya, I was gonna ask why you were still watching! ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:36 pm (UTC)So, Vogler wanted House to fire one of his Fellows, citing budget constraints. House was a bastard to staff in re: and told them he had to fire someone, creating a very interesting/toxic little experiment in human nature (this is when the Aussie blond guy started to get all nefarious and ratted out house etc). But in the end with the input of someone - Cameron? the oncologist? I'm not sure who... -- House decide to offer the fellows a cut in salary so they could all stay. Which they agreed to. But Vogler wanted the power play, not the budget and told House to fire someone anyway, so Cameron threw herself on the proverbial sword.
Then Vogler kept trying to get House fired. Called a board meeting, and threatened to withdraw donation if House was not fired. When oncologist guy was only dissenting vote in revoking House's tenure (which required unanimity, -- even Cuddy voted in favor) *HE* was fired. And so it continued, with Vogler threatening to remove any dissenting vote's tenure. Until Cuddy found her hutspa again and told Vogler to take his money and walk. After, while House and Oncologist were celebrating, Cuddy came in and said "ya, because you guys couldn't get along, we lost money that could have done good" -- and they saw that really, was not a celebration. The implication was that Cuddy had no choice -- Vogler was on a terribly destructive power trip -- he didn't give a penny for the hospital or the good it could do, or patient care. He just cared about power. And so, in the end, his money was not worth the cost.... Which Cuddy came to understand. And so she protected her staff and the integrity of the hospital. But she made Damn sure House understood that while he was an asset, that his actions had repercussions that could cost lives because money can save lives.
Um, I think that covers it, and hope it makes sense. The telling is probably a bit biased, because I found the Vogler subplot TERRIBLY annoying and I was Really Glad to see him GONE.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:41 pm (UTC)and thanks for filling me in.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 05:45 pm (UTC)