More on boy books
Jun. 1st, 2005 01:26 pmI take it back. The gender divide in reading continues into adulthood. Well, according to one limited sample, anyway. I dunno. Is this broadly applicable? What's the last book you read? And are you male or female?
Here is an annoyingly breezy Telegraph article that attempts to Explain It All.
Playboy once published an Ursula K. Le Guin short story under the name "U.K. Le Guin" -- something about their readers being intimidated or nervous or bored by female writers. I mocked when I learned this, but it sounds like they were onto something.
Here is an annoyingly breezy Telegraph article that attempts to Explain It All.
Playboy once published an Ursula K. Le Guin short story under the name "U.K. Le Guin" -- something about their readers being intimidated or nervous or bored by female writers. I mocked when I learned this, but it sounds like they were onto something.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 05:38 pm (UTC)I know that broadly speaking women use(d) male pseudonyms or initials only to write sci-fi and men use(d) female 'nyms or initials only for romance, but in general, I hadn't noticed a pattern at all. And I know at least several female authors (Cornwell, Fairstein, Jacobs) who write blood 'n' guts thrillers, and several male (Montgomery, Nick Sparks) who write sappy "emotional" stuff. This seems like *far* too broad a generalization.
Playboy, now, is a special case - men going to a mag filled with naked chicks being used as objects might be frightened by a woman who's got a brain in her head. :) Or at least I bet that was the reasoning.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:08 pm (UTC)Montgomery? As in Lucy Maud? I am confused.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:23 pm (UTC)Apparently *I'm* confused. I actually meant L. E. Modesitt - I have no idea where Montgomery came from! (I thought Modesitt was a woman, and he certainly writes moderately sappy fantasy.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:26 pm (UTC)And then there was Dragonlance. Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman, who I always assumed until just recently were both women.
Not that this Orange Prize survey was about anything NEARLY so déclassé as *shudder* genre fiction, so we have no business commenting at ALL.
But is this an appropriate time to mention that Martin Amis kind of creeps me out?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:32 pm (UTC)Was Dragonlance any good? I haven't read it. (Modesitt's singing sorceress series is good in the first book, but deteriorates rather rapidly thereafter.)
Amis kind of weirds me out, too. Enough that I really have only read one or two books by him.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:45 pm (UTC)I've actually never read any Dragonlance. I am allergic to series with their own logos. (I have had to relax this rule once or twice, but in general it has served me well.)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:53 pm (UTC)That sounds like a good policy. In fact, though I haven't been doing it consciously, I've been doing something similar - I keep picking up books with their own logos and muttering "ick" and putting them back down. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:54 pm (UTC)I mey Margaret Weiss at genCon last year - I went into crazy fangirl mode and started gushing about how much I love her. She didn't smack me or run away, so now I love her more :)
I also sort of met Tracy Hickman - he did a presentation I went to - he's CRAZY!!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:59 pm (UTC)It must have been very neat to meet her. I haven't read anything by her at all, actually, but I'm always willing to at least try a new fantasy author.
Hickman's crazy? Must be 'cause he has a girl's name and writes girlie stuff. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:02 pm (UTC)Hehe, yes, that must be why he's insane! Perfect explanation ;) Girlie writing can ruin a man, after all.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 11:43 am (UTC)Here's a basic list/primer: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/guides/guide-display/-/3GKV809NNU2I8/ref=cm_bg_dp_m_3/103-8576113-7718256
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:03 pm (UTC)I am still holding a few of your books hostage. I will send 'em back some time, promise...
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:04 pm (UTC)as for holding books hostage, I daresay it's a mutual thing :D.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-03 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 10:04 pm (UTC)Trying again:
I'm male and I'm currently reading "Dr. Adder" by K. W. Jeter who I believe to be male (but I could be wrong). Before that the last fiction book I read was probably by Czerneda, who is definitely female.
At one point (over 20 years ago now) I conciously avoided female SF authors, having read too much bad SF by authors with female names. These days I probably have more female than male names on my list of "must buy" authors. Certainly the list includes Czerneda, Bujold and Rowling.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 11:50 pm (UTC)Now I'm not a voracious reader of novels so my sample size is somewhat small, I did however complete an english degree so I should have something to say about now. The most violent reaction I can have here is about the two novels by women that damn near killed me trying to finish reading them for school. The two novels being To The Lighthouse by Virgina Woolf and Adam Bede by Geogre Eliot. Both of which struck me as having not a blessed thing happening that I gave two figs about. I guess all of that to say, if my only exposure to novels was through school I don't think I would ever try to read another novel by a woman ever again. Not ever, not never ever ever. Fortunately I'm surrounded by folks who are not only literate and literary but pushy about the shit that they read. :)
Which brings me to my last point, readership of novels especially is not (at least in my experience) dictated by critics or prize winners. It is dictated by what your best friend read and is just dying for someone else to read or what happens to be sitting on a shelf at the cottage you are staying at or by any number of things that have nothing to do with the cultured elite.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 04:50 pm (UTC)For the record, I also don't buy books that appear to be actively trying to target other demographics I'm not in. When there's are sections in the bookstore dedicated to a particular race or sexuality (and not the study of but books by) I don't look through that section. You put Armstead Maupin in with the rest of the fiction and I have no problem with him, segregate him and I think they don't want my patronage.
That said, it's certainly not an active predjudice against anyone I loves me some Margaret George and some Mary Lee Settle. But their books don't have frou frou covers on them.