electricland: (Default)
[personal profile] electricland
From Margaret Atwood, by way of [livejournal.com profile] crankygrrl's Mum:

3/28 Globe & Mail, Toronto

Dear America: This is a difficult letter to write, because I'm no longer sure who you are.

Some of you may be having the same trouble. I thought I knew you: We'd become well acquainted over the past 55 years. You were the Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck comic books I read in the late 1940s. You were the radio shows — Jack Benny, Our Miss Brooks. You were the music I sang and danced to: the Andrews Sisters, Ella Fitzgerald, the Platters, Elvis. You were a ton of fun.

You wrote some of my favourite books. You created Huckleberry Finn, and Hawkeye, and Beth and Jo in Little Women, courageous in their different ways. Later, you were my beloved Thoreau, father of environmentalism, witness to individual conscience; and Walt Whitman, singer of the great Republic; and Emily Dickinson, keeper of the private soul. You were Hammett and Chandler, heroic walkers of mean streets; even later, you were the amazing trio, Hemingway, Fitzgerald, and Faulkner, who traced the dark labyrinths of your hidden heart. You were Sinclair Lewis and Arthur Miller, who, with their own American idealism, went after the sham in you, because they thought you could do better.

You were Marlon Brando in On The Waterfront, you were Humphrey Bogart in Key Largo, you were Lillian Gish in Night of the Hunter. You stood up for freedom, honesty and justice; you protected the innocent. I believed most of that. I think you did, too. It seemed true at the time.

You put God on the money, though, even then. You had a way of thinking that the things of Caesar were the same as the things of God: that gave you self-confidence. You have always wanted to be a city upon a hill, a light to all nations, and for a while you were. Give me your tired, your poor, you sang, and for a while you meant it.

We've always been close, you and us. History, that old entangler, has twisted us together since the early 17th century. Some of us used to be you; some of us want to be you; some of you used to be us. You are not only our neighbours: In many cases — mine, for instance — you are also our blood relations, our colleagues, and our personal friends. But although we've had a ringside seat, we've never understood you completely, up here north of the 49th parallel.

We're like Romanized Gauls — look like Romans, dress like Romans, but aren't Romans — peering over the wall at the real Romans. What are they doing? Why? What are they doing now? Why is the haruspex eyeballing the sheep's liver? Why is the soothsayer wholesaling the Bewares?

Perhaps that's been my difficulty in writing you this letter: I'm not sure I know what's really going on. Anyway, you have a huge posse of experienced entrail-sifters who do nothing but analyze your every vein and lobe. What can I tell you about yourself that you don't already know?

This might be the reason for my hesitation: embarrassment, brought on by a becoming modesty. But it is more likely to be embarrassment of another sort. When my grandmother — from a New England background — was confronted With an unsavoury topic, she would change the subject and gaze out the window. And that is my own inclination: Mind your own business.

But I'll take the plunge, because your business is no longer merely your business. To paraphrase Marley's Ghost, who figured it out too late, mankind is your business. And vice versa: When the Jolly Green Giant goes on the rampage, any lesser plants and animals get trampled underfoot. As for us, you're our biggest trading partner: We know perfectly well that if you go down the plug-hole, we're going with you. We have every reason to wish you well.

I won't go into the reasons why I think your recent Iraqi adventures have been — taking the long view — an ill-advised tactical error. By the time you read this, Baghdad may or may not look like the craters of the Moon, and many more sheep entrails will have been examined. Let's talk, then, not about what you're doing to other people, but about what you're doing to yourselves.

You're gutting the Constitution. Already your home can be entered without your knowledge or permission, you can be snatched away and incarcerated without cause, your mail can be spied on, your private records searched. Why isn't this a recipe for widespread business theft, political intimidation, and fraud? I know you've been told all this is for your own safety and protection, but think about it for a minute. Anyway, when did you get so scared? You didn't used to be easily frightened.

You're running up a record level of debt. Keep spending at this rate and pretty soon you won't be able to afford any big military adventures. Either that or you'll go the way of the USSR: lots of tanks, but no air conditioning. That will make folks very cross. They'll be even crosser when they can't take a shower because your short-sighted bulldozing of environmental protections has dirtied most of the water and dried up the rest. Then things will get hot and dirty indeed.

You're torching the American economy. How soon before the answer to that will be, not to produce anything yourselves, but to grab stuff other people produce, at gunboat-diplomacy prices? Is the world going to consist of a few megarich King Midases, with the rest being serfs, both inside and outside your country? Will the biggest business sector in the United States be the prison system? Let's hope not.

If you proceed much further down the slippery slope, people around the world will stop admiring the good things about you. They'll decide that your city upon the hill is a slum and your democracy is a sham, and therefore you have no business trying to impose your sullied vision on them. They'll think you've abandoned the rule of law. They'll think you've fouled your own nest.

The British used to have a myth about King Arthur. He wasn't dead, but sleeping in a cave, it was said; in the country's hour of greatest peril, he would return. You, too, have great spirits of the past you may call upon: men and women of courage, of conscience, of prescience. Summon them now, to stand with you, to inspire you, to defend the best in you. You need them.

Margaret Atwood studied American literature — among other things — at Radcliffe and Harvard in the 1960s. She is the author of 10 novels. Her 11th, Oryx and Crake, will be published in May. This essay also appears in The Nation.

(Note, this article doesn't appear to be available online so I can't speak for the accuracy of the text. Good though.)

Date: 2003-04-09 10:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] life-on-queen.livejournal.com
Even though I don't particularly enjoy her books, Margaret Atwood and I think the same way about a great many ways.

I will dig out The Blind Assassin tonight and give it another try.

Date: 2003-04-10 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bryghtboy.livejournal.com
Sorry for the lateness of my reply... but after having sifted through so much text I felt I deserved to have an opinion.

The things that the American's say about themselves and the things they believe about themselves often bear very little resemblance to the truth. A lament for a return to "Good old American values" frightens and appalls me coming from Mrs. Atwood. Nostalgia for a time that did not really exist, in a strict unilateral way seems very odd. During the 1950's and 1960's the government was doing all kinds of creepy things, both in the name of democracy and in the name of protecting "American interests". Patriotic zeal aside, if Atwood wants to spur the US populace into action... maybe appealling to their humanity would be a better tact than their history cause their history books are just as full of blood as any other nation's. Sorry if this sounds like I disagree with her goals, just her methods leave a bitter taste ... or something... bleh I'm outta thinking juice.

Date: 2003-04-11 07:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] electricland.livejournal.com
I'm not sure I agree with you. What a country believes about itself -- its national myths, if you will -- are important. Remember Charlton Heston coming up here and yammering on about Canada's proud history of carrying guns in defense of liberty and we all just laughed at him?

America has a lot of national myths that are very powerful: Truth. Justice. Liberty. Equality. Whether or not its government has always acted in accordance with them is not entirely the point. They are now being betrayed openly.

Re:

Date: 2003-04-11 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bryghtboy.livejournal.com
I've got a lot of mixed feelings about the Americans. Truth, justice, liberty and equality sound great. I guess my objection is the way all throughout their history they have spoken about these lofty ideals while at the same time doing all kinds of dirty and low things. And so trying to harken back to doing more of the same seems... well like an endorsement of that duality. Its fine to do horrible things, if you are doing them in the name of Truth Justice Liberty and Equality... or something.

I've tried to think of a way to put into words the reason this doesn't sit well with me... I guess it boils down to the fact that I really don't like a lot of the stuff that the US has done in the past. So when Mrs. Atwood asks the US to return to the way they used to be, it upsets me.

I really do hope that one day the US lives up to the words that were written down and all of the myths they tell about themselves. So I guess keeping them alive and reminding them about these beliefs they had in themselves is important... but I don't know, I will always find US history a reason to cry not an ideal to which to strive. There is good there though, there are women and men of virtue... I just don't know how to separate them from all the rest. I think I posted that at like 5am or something cause its a tad offensive... sorry about that :)

Date: 2003-04-19 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] electricland.livejournal.com
Hm. I didn't read it that way. I read it very much as a "return to the best things about yourselves/live up to your ideals" plea.

Let's face it, there are very few countries out there with spotless pasts. At least the U.S. has ideals to live up to, even if they haven't always succeeded at it.

Re:

Date: 2003-04-20 01:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bryghtboy.livejournal.com
I would tend to agree there are very few countries with spotless records... I would further say that those with spotless records tend to be about 5-10 picoseconds old :)

Almost as a necessary part of government it seems bad stuff must happen now and again. That may just be my cyncism talking, but then again at least I'm free to voice my displeasure with governments... which is a step on the path.

Profile

electricland: (Default)
electricland

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 1st, 2026 07:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios