too good not to share

[electricland]

Via rolypolypony, using your browser history to estimate your gender:

Likelihood of you being FEMALE is 8%
Likelihood of you being MALE is 92%

Site	Male-Female Ratio
youtube.com	1
amazon.com	0.9
facebook.com	0.83
imdb.com	1.06
snopes.com	0.74
livejournal.com	0.68
google.ca	1.33
rottentomatoes.com	1.17
hotmail.com	0.83
guardian.co.uk	1.33
abebooks.com	0.96
amazon.ca	1.04
newyorker.com	1.22
theglobeandmail.com	1.5
thestar.com	1.47
newscientist.com	1.44
nationalpost.com	1.74
metacritic.com	1.56
motherjones.com	1.47

If they only knew!

Comments

[pretentiousgit.livejournal.com]

I got 86%. Something tells me this browser analysis is hinky, or overly slanted to The Daily Puppy and Cute Overload.

[electricland.livejournal.com]

Reading more carefully, it's analyzing someones "top 10k" sites -- so sites with less traffic are going to be overlooked. In my case, that's most of what I actually read -- blogs on people's own domains, xkcd, the site I work for, etc. etc. (I assure you the National Post is not one of my regular haunts.)

Mind you, I spend time at Daily Puppy too, and it didn't pick that up...