Misuse the word "chemical". As in "However, its chemical structure is very different from that of sugar and sucralose is actually a chemical substance."
OK, pay close attention because I don't want to have to say this more than once (but I will if you insist). EVERYTHING IS A CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE. Water is a chemical substance. Sucrose is a chemical substance. Oxygen is a chemical substance. Everything in the universe, including such items as cinnamon, ginseng, olive oil, concrete, glass, jet fuel, organically grown coffee beans and the human body, are ALL MADE UP OF CHEMICALS.
"Chemical" does not equal "unnatural" (just as, incidentally, "natural" does not equal "good for you").
This rant brought to you by a Google search for the chemical structure of sucralose (which was in turn brought to you by a comment in
food_porn to the effect that sucralose is a molecule in which all the carbon atoms are replaced by chlorine, which made me go "huh?").
Thank you for your attention.
OK, pay close attention because I don't want to have to say this more than once (but I will if you insist). EVERYTHING IS A CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE. Water is a chemical substance. Sucrose is a chemical substance. Oxygen is a chemical substance. Everything in the universe, including such items as cinnamon, ginseng, olive oil, concrete, glass, jet fuel, organically grown coffee beans and the human body, are ALL MADE UP OF CHEMICALS.
"Chemical" does not equal "unnatural" (just as, incidentally, "natural" does not equal "good for you").
This rant brought to you by a Google search for the chemical structure of sucralose (which was in turn brought to you by a comment in
Thank you for your attention.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-18 03:45 pm (UTC)My mom often says to not eat something or other because it's made of chemicals. teehee!
no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-18 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 08:18 am (UTC)As it turns out sucralose (Splenda) is sucrose with three hydroxyl groups replaced by chlorine atoms. NOT exactly the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-18 11:11 pm (UTC)SOME of us know this, actually ;).
no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 08:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 01:37 am (UTC)Feel free to shoot me...
no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 08:14 am (UTC)...see rant above...
no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 04:40 pm (UTC)Erm...
you're right. "Purely chemical" does seem to fit the bill, and doesn't raise my hackles as much as "chemical" for whatever reason.
shit, this is gonna bother me. I was going to say "inorganic" but that's equally imprecise.
*sigh* I'll keep working on this. Accurate adjective for a Jos Louis, come to me!
no subject
Date: 2003-12-23 12:24 am (UTC)But you know, you've said it, there's artificial vitamins. Which is what people aim their misplaced "ugh, that's just chemical" at, really. You're supposed to go for the real thing, aren't you?
I'm staying with artificial, now. I like it. It has a nicely degrading connotation. Implications of raised eyebrows ;)
no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 04:12 am (UTC)Or bee venom, totally natural and still not something I want in my body. Quite happy to eat their honey but can do without the venom. I guess when you get right down to it almost anything can be dangerous though. Like the dreaded di-hydrogen monoxide, enough of it and it'll damn near kill ya...
Exactly so.
Date: 2003-12-19 08:11 am (UTC)Deadly nightshade is natural. Aconite is natural. Curare is natural. Rattlesnake venom is natural... I could go on...
no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 08:10 am (UTC)That's damn funny, actually. I'm waiting for someone to do the same thing with "SUPER natural digitalis! HEALTHY!"
no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 08:42 am (UTC)